Johari Window

Johari WindowYesterday, a Simon buddy of mine, Stan, shared with us the top-level idea of the Johari Window, a psychological model for human interaction and self-disclosure. (Joseph Luft and Harry Ingham, the principal creators of the model in 1969, labeled their model the “Joe & Harry” or “Johari” Window.) I’ve obviously been under a rock, since I was able to find a wealth of information about the subject with a simple web search.

(See references one, two, and three for more reading about the model.)

The model is commonly used for understanding better what it takes to be an effective leader through communication, feedback, and honest discourse, which is part of the core fundamentals they teach us at Simon, especially in Professor Schmidt’s class. The model employs a four-part figure to reflect the interaction of two sources of information – self and others. The squared field, representing the “interpersonal space,” is partitioned into four regions with each region representing particular information-processing elements that have significance for the quality of relationships.

The Public Arena is the portion of the total interpersonal space devoted to mutual understanding and shared information. This known by the self / known by others facet of the relationship is thought to control interpersonal productivity. The assumption is that productivity and interpersonal effectiveness are directly related to the amount of mutually-held information. Therefore, the larger the Public Arena becomes, the more rewarding, effective, and productive the relationship is apt to be.

One can significantly influence the size of the Public Arena in relating to others by the behavioral processes you choose to use in your relationships. To the extent that you make others aware of relevant information which you have and they do not, you enlarge the Public Arena in a downward direction reducing the Private [Arena]. The process employed toward this end has been called by Luft and Ingham the Exposure Process. It entails the open and candid expression of feelings and factual knowledge.

Yet it takes two to communicate and the other party must also expose in order for communication to be productive. Therefore, active solicitation by you of the information of others must also be employed. This process is known as Feedback Solicitation. As one solicates feedback, the Public Arena extends to the right reducing your Blindspot. The overall idea is to increase your Public Arena, and thus establish truly effective relationships by engaging in optimum Exposure and Feedback solicitating behaviors.

Fiorina Departs While HP Returns to Status Quo

Carly Fiorina The news wires have been abuzz today with stories and reports of Carly Fiorina‘s abrupt departure from technology behemoth Hewlett-Packard. She has been a high-profile CEO since her arrival in 1999, and was the chief architect of HP’s merger with Compaq in 2002. However, since that merger, Fiorina has been revered as an ineffective CEO, and HP’s internal financial analysts contend that Compaq’s addition to the HP business model has dragged profits down and prevented the company from being as nimble as the board of directors believes it should be. Such an accusation is interesting unto itself, as Ms. Fiorina delivered the keynote address by invitation at this year’s Consumer Electronics Show in early January, an event that is recognized around the world as the showcase for new and cutting-edge technology innovations. (And I’m not the only one who thinks HP is well respected.)

The press release this morning stated

“The board of directors of Hewlett-Packard Company today announced that Carleton S. Fiorina has stepped down as chairman and chief executive officer, effective immediately. Robert P. Wayman, HP’s chief financial officer, has been named chief executive officer on an interim basis and appointed to the board of directors. Patricia C. Dunn, an HP director since 1998, has been named non-executive chairman of the board, also effective immediately.”

But the truth is, she didn’t “step down” as the press release casually states. The word from Wall Street is that she was forced to resign after a series of disagreements over objectives and strategies for making HP a better competitor in its core technology markets. Fiorina said in a statement this morning, “while I regret the board and I have differences about how to execute HP’s strategy, I respect their decision.” What is even more interesting is who is replacing her on an interim basis — Robert Wayman. Mr. Wayman is someone who has never liked Ms. Fiorina, and actually stepped down from the board in 2002, shortly after the Compaq deal was approved. Lo and behold, he is now the interim CEO, enabling HP to return to its old ways, and Fiorina is sent home with a $21 million severance package.